Core i3-7100U vs Xeon X5482

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7100U vs Xeon X5482 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7100U vs Xeon X5482: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7100U

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 620, while Xeon X5482 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5482 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,721 vs 2,755).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5482, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon X5482

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7100U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5482 better than Core i3-7100U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5482 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-7100U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5482 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5482 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5482 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5482 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7100U vs Xeon X5482 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100U

The Core i3-7100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,721 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon X5482

The Xeon X5482 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,755 points. Launch price was $1,279.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7100U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5482 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5482 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5482 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon X5482 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-7100U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5482 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100U scores 2,721 against the Xeon X5482's 2,755 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon X5482. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7100U vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5482.

Feature	Core i3-7100U	Xeon X5482
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	3 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB (total)+1100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,721	2,755+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	841	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5482 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7100U	Xeon X5482
Socket	BGA1356	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100U) / not specified (Xeon X5482). The Core i3-7100U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 620), while the Xeon X5482 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.