A10-5700 vs Core i3-7100U

A10-5700 vs Core i3-7100U Performance Spectrum

A10-5700

4 / 4

2,747

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-7100U

2 / 4

2,721

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-7100U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-7100U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5700

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-7100U.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Core i3-7100U

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,721 vs 2,747).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5700 better than Core i3-7100U?

Yes. A10-5700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5700 still makes the most sense overall. A10-5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5700 vs Core i3-7100U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-7100U

The Core i3-7100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,721 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7100U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-5700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100U — a 50% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A10-5700 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7100U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5700 scores 2,747 against the Core i3-7100U's 2,721 — a 1% lead for the A10-5700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5700 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7100U.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i3-7100U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,747	2,721
Geekbench 6 Single	—	841

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7100U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A10-5700 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7100U — the Core i3-7100U supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5700) vs 12 (Core i3-7100U) — the A10-5700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-5700	Core i3-7100U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5700) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5700) and HD Graphics 620 (Core i3-7100U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220; Core i3-7100U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.