
Core i3-7101E vs Celeron G6900

Core i3-7101E

Celeron G6900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-7101E is positioned at rank #520 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101E
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+53%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7101E and Celeron G6900

Core i3-7101E
The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.

Celeron G6900
The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7101E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G6900's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E versus 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-7101E uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G6900 uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7101E scores 4,430 against the Celeron G6900's 4,458 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G6900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 1,563, a 22.3% lead for the Celeron G6900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 4,430 | 4,458 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | 1,563+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,631 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7101E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101E versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900 — the Celeron G6900 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7101E) vs 20 (Celeron G6900) — the Celeron G6900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C236,C232,Q170,Q270 (Core i3-7101E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900).
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101E) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded, Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000; Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Embedded | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-7101E launched at $117 MSRP, while the Celeron G6900 debuted at $52. At current prices ($50 vs $77), the Core i3-7101E is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7101E delivers 88.6 pts/$ vs 57.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900 — making the Core i3-7101E the 41.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117 | $52-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-35% | $77 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.6+53% | 57.9 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















