Core i3-7101E
VS
Pentium 6805

Core i3-7101E vs Pentium 6805

Intel

Core i3-7101E

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium 6805

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7101E is positioned at rank 520 and the Pentium 6805 is on rank 744, so the Core i3-7101E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8233%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7780%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5649%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1702%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1348%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1179%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
675%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
667%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
607%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
607%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
600%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
584%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
576%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
573%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
568%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
100%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
98%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#520
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
100%
#522
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
100%
#525
Celeron G1840T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#527
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
99%
#528
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
98%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
98%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
97%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
97%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 6805

#732
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1068%
#733
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1052%
#734
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
966%
#735
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
961%
#736
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
953%
#738
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
920%
#739
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
882%
#740
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
881%
#741
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
857%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#749
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-7101E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium 6805 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-Y (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core i3-7101E leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 69% cheaper ($50 vs $161) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+222%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7101E and Pentium 6805

Intel

Core i3-7101E

The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.

Intel

Pentium 6805

The Pentium 6805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 4,424 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7101E and Pentium 6805 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E versus 3 GHz on the Pentium 6805 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-7101E uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 6805 uses Ice Lake-Y (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7101E scores 4,430 against the Pentium 6805's 4,424 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-7101E. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium 6805.

FeatureCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+30%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+255%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Ice Lake-Y (2020)
PassMark
4,430
4,424
Geekbench 6 Single
1,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7101E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 6805 uses FCBGA1526 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1526
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E) / not specified (Pentium 6805). The Core i3-7101E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Pentium 6805 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000.

FeatureCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-7101E launched at $117 MSRP, while the Pentium 6805 debuted at $161. At current prices ($50 vs $161), the Core i3-7101E is $111 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7101E delivers 88.6 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium 6805 — making the Core i3-7101E the 105.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-7101EPentium 6805
MSRP
$117-27%
$161
Avg Price (30d)
$50-69%
$161
Performance per Dollar
88.6+222%
27.5
Release Date
2017
2020