
Core i3-7101E

Core i7-2820QM
Core i3-7101E vs Core i7-2820QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7101E vs Core i7-2820QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7101E vs Core i7-2820QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7101E
2017Why buy it
- β +1.2% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $451 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
- β Delivers 391.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.9 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2820QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- β20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.
Core i7-2820QM
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (4,379 vs 4,430).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 37.9 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-7101E better than Core i7-2820QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7101E vs Core i7-2820QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7101E
The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i7-2820QM
The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7101E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2820QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-2820QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM β a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-7101E uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2820QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7101E scores 4,430 against the Core i7-2820QM's 4,379 β a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-7101E. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,250 vs 554, a 77.2% lead for the Core i3-7101E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+70% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 4,430+1% | 4,379 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250+126% | 554 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,763 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7101E uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2820QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101E versus 1600 on the Core i7-2820QM β the Core i3-7101E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7101E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C236,C232,Q170,Q270 (Core i3-7101E) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2820QM).
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E) vs true (Core i7-2820QM). Both include integrated graphics β HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101E) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2820QM) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000; Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Embedded | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-7101E was priced at $117, while the Core i7-2820QM came in at $568. On launch pricing ($117 vs $568), Core i3-7101E was $451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7101E delivers 37.9 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-2820QM β making the Core i3-7101E the 132.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7101E | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-79% | $568 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.9+392% | 7.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














