
Core i3-7350K

Core i5-10400F
Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7350K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,100 vs 8,191).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.3 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +77.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-7350K.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7350K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i3-7350K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7350K vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7350K
The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7350K packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-7350K uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7350K scores 4,886 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 90.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,100 vs 8,191 (90.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,298 vs 1,454, a 11.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,740 vs 5,783 (71.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 4,886 | 13,029+167% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,100 | 8,191+164% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,298 | 1,454+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,740 | 5,783+111% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7350K versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z270,Intel Z170,Intel H270,Intel B250,Intel Q270,Intel Q250 (Core i3-7350K) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666+11% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i3-7350K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Core i3-7350K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-7350K was priced at $179, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($179 vs $160), Core i5-10400F was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7350K delivers 27.3 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 99.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7350K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $160-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.3 | 81.4+198% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














