Core i3-8145UE vs Opteron 6212

Core i3-8145UE vs Opteron 6212 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-8145UE

2 / 4

4,021

+1.2%

3,973

0.0%

Athlon II X4 630

Athlon X4 740

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen 7 6800H

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8145UE vs Opteron 6212 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8145UE vs Opteron 6212: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8145UE

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 620, while Opteron 6212 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6212 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6212, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
❌
5.6% HIGHER MSRP
$281 MSRPvs$266 MSRP

Opteron 6212

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,973 vs 4,021).
❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8145UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8145UE better than Opteron 6212?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6212 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8145UE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8145UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8145UE is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6212 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-8145UE comes in 5.6% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6212 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6212 is also 4.4% better value on MSRP (14.9 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8145UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8145UE vs Opteron 6212 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8145UE

The Core i3-8145UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,021 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 6212

The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8145UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6212 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6212 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8145UE versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-8145UE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-8145UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6212 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8145UE scores 4,021 against the Opteron 6212's 3,973 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-8145UE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8145UE vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212.

Feature	Core i3-8145UE	Opteron 6212
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (per module)+700%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,021+1%	3,973
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,356	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,218	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,356	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8145UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6212 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8145UE	Opteron 6212
Socket	FCBGA1528	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8145UE) / not specified (Opteron 6212). The Core i3-8145UE includes integrated graphics (UHD 620), while the Opteron 6212 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8145UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8145UE rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	Core i3-8145UE	Opteron 6212
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD 620	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8145UE was priced at $281, while the Opteron 6212 came in at $266. On launch pricing ($281 vs $266), Opteron 6212 was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8145UE delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Opteron 6212 — making the Opteron 6212 the 4.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8145UE	Opteron 6212
MSRP	$281	$266-5%
Performance per Dollar	14.3	14.9+4%
Release Date	2018	2011

Search Core i3-8145UE on Amazon

Search Opteron 6212 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.