Core i3-8145UE vs Core i7-7567U

Intel

Core i3-8145UE

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-7567U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-8145UE vs Core i7-7567U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8145UE vs Core i7-7567U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8145UE vs Core i7-7567U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8145UE

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 620, while Core i7-7567U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7567U across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,021 vs 4,095).
  • Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i7-7567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8145UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7567U better than Core i3-8145UE?
Yes. Core i7-7567U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7567U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7567U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-7567U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8145UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.8% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8145UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8145UE vs Core i7-7567U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-8145UE

The Core i3-8145UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,021 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8145UE and Core i7-7567U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8145UE versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-8145UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7567U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8145UE scores 4,021 against the Core i7-7567U's 4,095 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-7567U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8145UE vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U.

FeatureCore i3-8145UECore i7-7567U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,021
4,095+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,356
Geekbench 6 Single
1,218
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,356
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8145UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7567U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-8145UECore i7-7567U
Socket
FCBGA1528
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8145UE) / not specified (Core i7-7567U). The Core i3-8145UE includes integrated graphics (UHD 620), while the Core i7-7567U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8145UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8145UE rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureCore i3-8145UECore i7-7567U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 620
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget