
Core i3-9100

Core i5-7600
Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-7600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-7600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-7600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $102 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.0 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600.
Core i5-7600
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i3-9100 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-9100.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,568 vs 6,586).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 54.0 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9100 better than Core i5-7600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100 vs Core i5-7600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100
The Core i3-9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,586 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i5-7600
The Core i5-7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,568 points. Launch price was $224.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-9100 and Core i5-7600 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-7600 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-9100 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7600 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100 scores 6,586 against the Core i5-7600's 6,568 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-9100. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-9100 | Core i5-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 6,586 | 6,568 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,307 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i3-9100 | Core i5-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-9100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600). The Core i5-7600 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-9100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600 rivals Ryzen 5 1500X.
| Feature | Core i3-9100 | Core i5-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100 was priced at $122, while the Core i5-7600 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($122 vs $224), Core i3-9100 was $102 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100 delivers 54.0 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-7600 — making the Core i3-9100 the 59.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100 | Core i5-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-46% | $224 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.0+84% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















