Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E5-4620

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E5-4620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E5-4620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,019 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1642.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.0 vs 3.1 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,586 vs 6,635).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-4620

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 54.0 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4620 better than Core i3-9100?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4620 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-4620 comes in 1654.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,141 MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-9100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,586 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E5-4620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100

The Core i3-9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,586 points. Launch price was $122.

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-9100 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100 scores 6,586 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-4620. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100 vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+62%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	16384 kB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,586	6,635

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E5-4620
Socket	LGA1151	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9100 was priced at $122, while the Xeon E5-4620 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($122 vs $2141), Core i3-9100 was $2019 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100 delivers 54.0 pts/$ vs 3.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4620 — making the Core i3-9100 the 178.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E5-4620
MSRP	$122-94%	$2141
Performance per Dollar	54.0+1642%	3.1
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Core i3-9100 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.