Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E7340

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9100

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.0 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,544 vs 6,586).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 54.0 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9100 better than Xeon E7340?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-9100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-9100 comes in $91 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 75.7% better value on MSRP (54.0 vs 30.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9100 vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100

The Core i3-9100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,586 points. Launch price was $122.

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-9100 scores 6,586 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-9100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E7340
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	6,586	6,544

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E7340
Socket	LGA1151	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9100 was priced at $122, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($122 vs $213), Core i3-9100 was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100 delivers 54.0 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Core i3-9100 the 54.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9100	Xeon E7340
MSRP	$122-43%	$213
Performance per Dollar	54.0+76%	30.7
Release Date	2019	2007

Search Core i3-9100 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.