
Core i3-9100HL

Core i5-13400F
Core i3-9100HL vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100HL vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9100HL vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100HL
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,373 vs 11,408).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +184.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 731.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9100HL can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i3-9100HL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100HL vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100HL
The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100HL packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-9100HL uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100HL scores 3,454 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 151.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,037 vs 2,407, a 79.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,373 vs 11,408 (131.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100HL vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i3-9100HL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 3,454 | 25,029+625% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,037 | 2,407+132% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,373 | 11,408+381% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100HL uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-9100HL) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Core i3-9100HL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 2666 MHz | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-9100HL) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i3-9100HL includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i3-9100HL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100HL was priced at $225, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($225 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100HL delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 157.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100HL | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $196-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.4 | 127.7+729% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














