Core i3-9100HL
VS
Core i7-2657M

Core i3-9100HL vs Core i7-2657M

Intel

Core i3-9100HL

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9100HL

#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
127%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
127%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
126%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
125%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
125%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
124%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
124%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
120%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
120%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
113%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
113%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
111%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
108%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
105%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
103%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
100%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
100%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
96%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
95%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
94%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
88%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
82%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
81%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
81%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
80%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
78%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
76%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
76%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
74%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
69%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9100HL (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-9100HLCore i7-2657M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2657M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-9100HLCore i7-2657M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-9100HL and Core i7-2657M

Intel

Core i3-9100HL

The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The Core i3-9100HL packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2657M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-9100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100HL (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-9100HL uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2657M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100HL scores 3,454 against the Core i7-2657M's 3,491 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2657M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,037 vs 535, a 63.9% lead for the Core i3-9100HL that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100HL vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M.

FeatureCore i3-9100HLCore i7-2657M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+7%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,454
3,491+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,037+94%
535
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9100HL uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2657M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2657M — the Core i3-9100HL supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9100HL supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2657M).

FeatureCore i3-9100HLCore i7-2657M
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4 2666 MHz+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-9100HL) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-9100HL) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded, Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureCore i3-9100HLCore i7-2657M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
Ultrabook