Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL

Intel

Core i3-4160

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-9100HL

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2019

Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4160

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $108 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 95.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-9100HL.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • ❌116% higher power demand at 54W vs 25W.

Core i3-9100HL

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 25W instead of 54W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (3,454 vs 3,506).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4160 better than Core i3-9100HL?
Yes. Core i3-4160 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4160 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4160 comes in $108 cheaper on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 95.2% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4160

The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.

Intel

Core i3-9100HL

The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i3-4160 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-9100HL offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Core i3-9100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL β€” a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-4160 uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-9100HL uses Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4160 scores 3,506 against the Core i3-9100HL's 3,454 β€” a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-4160. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,100 vs 1,037, a 5.9% lead for the Core i3-4160 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100HL.

FeatureCore i3-4160Core i3-9100HL
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+24%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+125%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019)
PassMark
3,506+2%
3,454
Geekbench 6 Single
1,100+6%
1,037
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
2,373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4160 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-9100HL uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4160 versus DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL β€” the Core i3-9100HL supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9100HL supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160) and Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL).

FeatureCore i3-4160Core i3-9100HL
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4 2666 MHz+67%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160) vs true (Core i3-9100HL). Both include integrated graphics β€” HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-9100HL) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.

FeatureCore i3-4160Core i3-9100HL
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
true
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Embedded
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4160 was priced at $117, while the Core i3-9100HL came in at $225. On launch pricing ($117 vs $225), Core i3-4160 was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4160 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-9100HL β€” making the Core i3-4160 the 64.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-4160Core i3-9100HL
MSRP
$117-48%
$225
Performance per Dollar
30.0+95%
15.4
Release Date
2014
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.