
Core i3-4160

Core i3-9100HL
Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4160
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $108 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Delivers 95.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-9100HL.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- β116% higher power demand at 54W vs 25W.
Core i3-9100HL
2019Why buy it
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Draws 25W instead of 54W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,454 vs 3,506).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4160 better than Core i3-9100HL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4160 vs Core i3-9100HL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4160
The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.

Core i3-9100HL
The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4160 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-9100HL offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Core i3-9100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL β a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-4160 uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-9100HL uses Coffee Lake (2017β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4160 scores 3,506 against the Core i3-9100HL's 3,454 β a 1.5% lead for the Core i3-4160. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,100 vs 1,037, a 5.9% lead for the Core i3-4160 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100HL.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Core i3-9100HL |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+125% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) |
| PassMark | 3,506+2% | 3,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,100+6% | 1,037 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 2,373 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4160 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-9100HL uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4160 versus DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL β the Core i3-9100HL supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9100HL supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160) and Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL).
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Core i3-9100HL |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4 2666 MHz+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160) vs true (Core i3-9100HL). Both include integrated graphics β HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-9100HL) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Core i3-9100HL |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4160 was priced at $117, while the Core i3-9100HL came in at $225. On launch pricing ($117 vs $225), Core i3-4160 was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4160 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-9100HL β making the Core i3-4160 the 64.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Core i3-9100HL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-48% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0+95% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















