A10-7890K
VS
Core i3-4160

A10-7890K vs Core i3-4160

AMD

A10-7890K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-4160

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7890K is positioned at rank 364 and the Core i3-4160 is on rank 596, so the A10-7890K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7890K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5288%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1093%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
757%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
390%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
390%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
385%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
375%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
370%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
368%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
365%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
95%
#363
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#364
A10-7890K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#365
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
100%
#377
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10401%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9828%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7136%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2150%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1703%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1490%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
853%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
767%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
767%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
758%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
738%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
727%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
724%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
718%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
100%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-4160 leads in gaming performance. However, the A10-7890K is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-7890KCore i3-4160
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($52)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-7890KCore i3-4160
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($52)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7890K and Core i3-4160

AMD

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Core i3-4160

The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4160 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7890K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4160 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Core i3-4160's 3,506 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-7890K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 1,100, a 58.8% lead for the Core i3-4160 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160.

FeatureA10-7890KCore i3-4160
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+19%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+11%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,537
3,506
Geekbench 6 Single
600
1,100+83%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4160 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7890K) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160).

FeatureA10-7890KCore i3-4160
Socket
FM2+
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7890K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7890K) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10-7890K) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget, Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100; Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.

FeatureA10-7890KCore i3-4160
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Budget Desktop