A10-7890K vs Ryzen 3 2200U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen 3 2200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen 3 2200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7890K

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 3 2200U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 2200U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,537 vs 3,583).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 2200U

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7890K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7890K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7890K.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 2200U better than A10-7890K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7890K is ahead with a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200U pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 2200U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 2200U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 2200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7890K vs Ryzen 3 2200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Ryzen 3 2200U

The Ryzen 3 2200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,583 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 3 2200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7890K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2200U — a 23.4% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Ryzen 3 2200U's 3,583 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 2200U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2200U.

Feature	A10-7890K	Ryzen 3 2200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+26%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+60%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	3,537	3,583+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7890K	Ryzen 3 2200U
Socket	FM2+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2200U). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 3 2200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.