A10-7890K
VS
Athlon II X4 651

A10-7890K vs Athlon II X4 651

AMD

A10-7890K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 651

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7890K is positioned at rank 364 and the Athlon II X4 651 is on rank 505, so the A10-7890K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7890K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5288%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1093%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
757%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
390%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
390%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
385%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
375%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
370%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
368%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
365%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
95%
#363
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#364
A10-7890K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#365
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
100%
#377
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 651

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8001%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7560%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5489%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1310%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1146%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
656%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
648%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
590%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
590%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
583%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
567%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
559%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
557%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
552%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
100%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
100%
#510
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#514
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
98%
#517
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#518
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
97%
#519
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A10-7890K leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II X4 651 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-7890KAthlon II X4 651
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($92)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-7890KAthlon II X4 651
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($92)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 651

AMD

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

AMD

Athlon II X4 651

The Athlon II X4 651 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,584 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the A10-7890K and Athlon II X4 651 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 651 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Athlon II X4 651's 3,584 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon II X4 651. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA10-7890KAthlon II X4 651
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+43%
3 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+33%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+300%
1 MB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,537
3,584+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The A10-7890K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7890K) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 651).

FeatureA10-7890KAthlon II X4 651
Socket
FM2+
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Athlon II X4 651). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Athlon II X4 651 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.

FeatureA10-7890KAthlon II X4 651
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget