A10-7890K
VS
Core i7-975

A10-7890K vs Core i7-975

AMD

A10-7890K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-975

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7890K is positioned at rank 364 and the Core i7-975 is on rank 1084, so the A10-7890K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7890K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5288%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3628%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1093%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
866%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
757%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
390%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
390%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
385%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
375%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
370%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
368%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
365%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
95%
#363
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#364
A10-7890K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#365
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
100%
#377
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-975

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
88305%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
83439%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
60584%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
18251%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14457%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
12647%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7244%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7149%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6509%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6509%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6436%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6262%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6175%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6150%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6094%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
100%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
98%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
97%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
94%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
93%
#1090
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
93%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
93%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
92%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
92%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
88%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
86%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
80%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
74%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
67%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
65%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-7890K (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-7890KCore i7-975
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-975 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-7890KCore i7-975
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7890K and Core i7-975

AMD

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Core i7-975

The Core i7-975 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,527 points. Launch price was $476.

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-975's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-975 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-975 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Core i7-975's 3,527 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-7890K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-975.

FeatureA10-7890KCore i7-975
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+19%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+20%
3.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,537
3,527
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-975 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-7890KCore i7-975
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Core i7-975). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-975 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.

FeatureA10-7890KCore i7-975
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget