A10-7890K vs Pentium Gold G6400T

AMD

A10-7890K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold G6400T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WW2020
Similar parts
·······

A10-7890K vs Pentium Gold G6400T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7890K vs Pentium Gold G6400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7890K vs Pentium Gold G6400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7890K

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Pentium Gold G6400T needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium Gold G6400T.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,537 vs 3,544).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Pentium Gold G6400T

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7890K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while A10-7890K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7890K.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Gold G6400T better than A10-7890K?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7890K is ahead with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold G6400T pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold G6400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium Gold G6400T still makes the most sense overall. Pentium Gold G6400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold G6400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7890K vs Pentium Gold G6400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Pentium Gold G6400T

The Pentium Gold G6400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,544 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold G6400T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7890K has 2 more cores. The A10-7890K is built on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Pentium Gold G6400T's 3,544 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Gold G6400T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium Gold G6400T.

FeatureA10-7890KPentium Gold G6400T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
4096 kB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
3,537
3,544
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold G6400T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-7890KPentium Gold G6400T
Socket
FM2+
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Pentium Gold G6400T). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Gold G6400T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.

FeatureA10-7890KPentium Gold G6400T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget