Core i3-1000NG4 vs Core i3-4160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Core i3-4160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Core i3-4160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1000NG4

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 54W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4160 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160.

Core i3-4160

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i3-1000NG4 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-1000NG4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,506 vs 3,530).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i3-1000NG4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌500% higher power demand at 54W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1000NG4 better than Core i3-4160?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4160 is ahead with a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i3-1000NG4 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1000NG4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1000NG4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-1000NG4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Core i3-4160 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1000NG4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1000NG4 vs Core i3-4160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1000NG4

The Core i3-1000NG4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1044. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 3,530 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4160

The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1000NG4 and Core i3-4160 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-1000NG4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-4160 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1000NG4 scores 3,530 against the Core i3-4160's 3,506 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-1000NG4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-1000NG4 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160.

Feature	Core i3-1000NG4	Core i3-4160
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-Y (2020)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,530	3,506
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1000NG4 uses the BGA1044 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4160 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1000NG4	Core i3-4160
Socket	BGA1044	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-1000NG4) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160). The Core i3-4160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i3-1000NG4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.