
Core i3-4160

Ryzen Embedded V1202B
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4160
2014Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Ryzen Embedded V1202B needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V1202B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,506 vs 3,512).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.0 vs 35.1 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.1 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4160 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V1202B better than Core i3-4160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4160
The Core i3-4160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $133.


Ryzen Embedded V1202B
The Ryzen Embedded V1202B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,512 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Embedded V1202B share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4160 versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-4160 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4160 scores 3,506 against the Ryzen Embedded V1202B's 3,512 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Ryzen Embedded V1202B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,506 | 3,512 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,100 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4160 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Ryzen Embedded V1202B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1202B). The Core i3-4160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160 rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Ryzen Embedded V1202B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4160 was priced at $117, while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B came in at $100. On launch pricing ($117 vs $100), Ryzen Embedded V1202B was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4160 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 35.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1202B the 15.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4160 | Ryzen Embedded V1202B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117 | $100-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0 | 35.1+17% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















