Core i3-9320 vs Core i3-10100T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i3-10100T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i3-10100T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9320

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌
3.4% HIGHER MSRP
$154 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌77.1% higher power demand at 62W vs 35W.

Core i3-10100T

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 62W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,305 vs 7,358).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9320 better than Core i3-10100T?

Yes. Core i3-9320 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-9320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9320 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i3-9320 comes in 3.4% more expensive on MSRP at $154 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10100T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,305 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10100T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-9320 vs Core i3-10100T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9320

The Core i3-9320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,358 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-10100T

The Core i3-10100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,305 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i3-10100T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-9320 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-10100T — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-9320 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-9320 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-9320 scores 7,358 against the Core i3-10100T's 7,305 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-9320. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9320 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10100T.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i3-10100T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+16%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	7,358	7,305

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10100T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i3-10100T
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9320 was priced at $154, while the Core i3-10100T came in at $149. On launch pricing ($154 vs $149), Core i3-10100T was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9320 delivers 47.8 pts/$ vs 49.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-10100T — making the Core i3-10100T the 2.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Core i3-10100T
MSRP	$154	$149-3%
Performance per Dollar	47.8	49.0+3%
Release Date	2019	2020

Search Core i3-9320 on Amazon

Search Core i3-10100T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.