Core i3-9320 vs Xeon Phi 7210

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon Phi 7210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon Phi 7210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9320

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,727 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1130.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 215W, a 153W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Phi 7210 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7210, which brings 64 cores / 256 threads.

Xeon Phi 7210

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 256 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,306 vs 7,358).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 47.8 PassMark/$ ($1,881 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
❌246.8% higher power demand at 215W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9320 better than Xeon Phi 7210?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Phi 7210 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9320 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9320 is the better buy right now. Core i3-9320 comes in $1,727 cheaper on MSRP at $154 MSRP versus $1,881 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Phi 7210 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1130.1% better value on MSRP (47.8 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 64/256. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9320 vs Xeon Phi 7210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9320

The Core i3-9320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,358 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Phi 7210

The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 60 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-9320 versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 98.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-9320 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-9320 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9320 scores 7,358 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-9320. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9320 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon Phi 7210
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	64 / 256+1500%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+193%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+185%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	7,358	7,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon Phi 7210
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9320 was priced at $154, while the Xeon Phi 7210 came in at $1881. On launch pricing ($154 vs $1881), Core i3-9320 was $1727 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9320 delivers 47.8 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Core i3-9320 the 169.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9320	Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP	$154-92%	$1881
Performance per Dollar	47.8+1126%	3.9
Release Date	2019	2016

Search Core i3-9320 on Amazon

Search Xeon Phi 7210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.