Core i3-L13G4
VS
Core i3-3217UE

Core i3-L13G4 vs Core i3-3217UE

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-3217UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-L13G4 is positioned at rank 1210 and the Core i3-3217UE is on rank 1187, so the Core i3-3217UE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-L13G4

#1198
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6113%
#1199
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6023%
#1200
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5529%
#1201
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5504%
#1202
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5454%
#1204
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5267%
#1205
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5050%
#1206
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5042%
#1207
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4906%
#1210
Core i3-L13G4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
99%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
97%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
95%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
92%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
87%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
85%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3217UE

#1175
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4850%
#1176
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4779%
#1177
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4387%
#1178
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4367%
#1179
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4327%
#1181
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4179%
#1182
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4007%
#1183
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4000%
#1184
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3893%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
100%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
99%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
97%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
93%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
93%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
88%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
87%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
87%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-L13G4 (2020) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-L13G4Core i3-3217UE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3217UE (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and **unknown Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-L13G4Core i3-3217UE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-L13G4 and Core i3-3217UE

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i3-3217UE

The Core i3-3217UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,362 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-L13G4 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i3-3217UE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 versus 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-3217UE — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4. The Core i3-L13G4 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-3217UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-L13G4 scores 1,349 against the Core i3-3217UE's 1,362 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-3217UE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3217UE.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i3-3217UE
Cores / Threads
5 / 5+150%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+75%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
0.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Lakefield (2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,349
1,362
Geekbench 6 Single
353
Geekbench 6 Multi
790
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-L13G4 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3217UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i3-L13G4 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3217UE — the Core i3-L13G4 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3217UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i3-L13G4) vs 2 (Core i3-3217UE). PCIe lanes: 8 (Core i3-L13G4) vs 16 (Core i3-3217UE) — the Core i3-3217UE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i3-3217UE
Socket
FC-CSP1016
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4x-4267+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4) vs Yes (Core i3-3217UE). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3217UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile, Core i3-3217UE targets Embedded.

FeatureCore i3-L13G4Core i3-3217UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Mobile
Embedded