Core i3-L13G4 vs Pentium 3560M

Intel

Core i3-L13G4

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 3560M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-L13G4 vs Pentium 3560M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Pentium 3560M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Pentium 3560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-L13G4

2020

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Pentium 3560M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 3560M

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,345 vs 1,349).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
    • 7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-L13G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-L13G4 better than Pentium 3560M?
    Yes. Core i3-L13G4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i3-L13G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-L13G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-L13G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-L13G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i3-L13G4 vs Pentium 3560M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-L13G4

    The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

    Intel

    Pentium 3560M

    The Pentium 3560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,345 points. Launch price was $134.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-L13G4 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Pentium 3560M offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 3560M — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-L13G4 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Pentium 3560M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-L13G4 scores 1,349 against the Pentium 3560M's 1,345 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-L13G4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-L13G4 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3560M.

    FeatureCore i3-L13G4Pentium 3560M
    Cores / Threads
    5 / 5+150%
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.8 GHz+17%
    2.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    0.8 GHz
    2.4 GHz+200%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)+100%
    2 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB
    Process
    10 nm-55%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Lakefield (2020)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    1,349
    1,345
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-L13G4 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3560M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-L13G4Pentium 3560M
    Socket
    FC-CSP1016
    PGA946
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR4x-4267
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    4
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    8
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4) / not specified (Pentium 3560M). The Core i3-L13G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Pentium 3560M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile.

    FeatureCore i3-L13G4Pentium 3560M
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Mobile