Core i3-L13G4 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Core i3-L13G4 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-L13G4

5 / 5

1,349

+0.7%

1,339

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-L13G4

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,349).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-L13G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-L13G4 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

Yes. Core i3-L13G4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-L13G4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-L13G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-L13G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-L13G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-L13G4 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-L13G4 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-L13G4. The Core i3-L13G4 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-L13G4 scores 1,349 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-L13G4.

Feature	Core i3-L13G4	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+47%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	0.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	10 nm-85%	65 nm
Architecture	Lakefield (2020)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,349	1,339

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-58). The Core i3-L13G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile.