
Core i5-10300H

Core i7-9700K
Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10300H
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,209 vs 14,397).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +59.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core i5-10300H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i5-10300H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10300H vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10300H
The Core i5-10300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10300H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K β a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10300H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10300H scores 8,209 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 β a 54.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10300H vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 8,209 | 14,397+75% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,533 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10300H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i5-10300H versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K β the Core i5-10300H supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM470,QM480,WM490 (Core i5-10300H) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10300H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-10300H) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10300H targets Performance Laptop, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10300H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














