
Core i5-10300H

Opteron 6386 SE
Core i5-10300H vs Opteron 6386 SE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10300H vs Opteron 6386 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10300H vs Opteron 6386 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10300H
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6386 SE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (8,209 vs 8,291).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6386 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6386 SE
2012Why buy it
- β +1% higher PassMark.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10300H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,392 MSRP, while Core i5-10300H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-10300H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10300H better than Opteron 6386 SE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10300H vs Opteron 6386 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10300H
The Core i5-10300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6386 SE
The Opteron 6386 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $2,408.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6386 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads β the Opteron 6386 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10300H versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 6386 SE β a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-10300H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10300H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10300H scores 8,209 against the Opteron 6386 SE's 8,291 β a 1% lead for the Opteron 6386 SE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10300H vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6386 SE.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+29% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+1500% | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,209 | 8,291 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,533 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10300H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10300H) / not specified (Opteron 6386 SE). The Core i5-10300H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6386 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10300H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10300H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















