Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1240 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10300H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1240 v5 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,209 vs 8,258).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1240 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10300H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10300H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10300H better than Xeon E3-1240 v5?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10300H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240 v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10300H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10300H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10300H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10300H

The Core i5-10300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240 v5

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151, LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,258 points. Launch price was $282.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10300H and Xeon E3-1240 v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10300H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v5 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10300H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10300H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10300H scores 8,209 against the Xeon E3-1240 v5's 8,258 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v5. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10300H vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Feature	Core i5-10300H	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+15%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	8,209	8,258
Geekbench 6 Single	1,533	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10300H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses LGA1151, LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10300H	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1151, LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10300H) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v5). The Core i5-10300H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10300H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10300H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.