
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-10500T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $226 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $226 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-10500T.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-10500T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,140 vs 13,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($226 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-10500T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $226 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $226 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-10500T.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,140 vs 13,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($226 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-10500T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 254 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-10500T

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-10500T
Core i5-10500T
The Core i5-10500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,140 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-10500T share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-10500T — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-10500T's 10,140 — a 24.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10500T.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+26% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 13,029+28% | 10,140 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core i5-10500T). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-10500T debuted at $226. On MSRP ($160 vs $226), the Core i5-10400F is $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-10500T — making the Core i5-10400F the 57.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-10500T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-29% | $226 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+81% | 44.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












