Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 2600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

13,145

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 2600

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,344 vs 8,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 5 2600?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 29.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in $39 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.3% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 66.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 2600 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 5 2600

The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 2600 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 6,344 (25.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,163, a 22.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 4,893 (16.7% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 2600
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+8433%	3 MB
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
PassMark	13,029	13,145
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191+29%	6,344
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+25%	1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+18%	4,893

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 5 2600 — the Ryzen 5 2600 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 2600) — the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AMD B450,AMD X470,AMD B350,AMD X370 (Ryzen 5 2600).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 2600
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 2600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 2600
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	General Productivity

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 5 2600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($160 vs $199), Core i5-10400F was $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 66.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2600 — making the Core i5-10400F the 20.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP	$160-20%	$199
Performance per Dollar	81.4+23%	66.1
Release Date	2020	2018

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 2600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.