PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-11320H.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-11320H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,852 vs 8,191).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i5-11320H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-11320H.

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,852 vs 8,191).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-11320H?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 40% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 19.8% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 40% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 18.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11320H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-11320H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
1080p
low	192 FPS	176 FPS
medium	152 FPS	148 FPS
high	123 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	151 FPS
medium	119 FPS	123 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	85 FPS
medium	70 FPS	75 FPS
high	55 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-11320H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
1080p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	318 FPS	272 FPS
high	290 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	209 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	292 FPS	244 FPS
high	267 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	222 FPS
medium	258 FPS	188 FPS
high	235 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	128 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-11320H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
1080p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	326 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	326 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	289 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	254 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-11320H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
1080p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	326 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	326 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	272 FPS
high	326 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-11320H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11320H

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-11320H

The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-11320H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-11320H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-11320H uses Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-11320H's 10,879 — a 18% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 5,852 (33.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,447, a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,633 (2.6% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
PassMark	13,029+20%	10,879
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191+40%	5,852
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,447
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+3%	5,633

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-11320H uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-11320H) — the Core i5-11320H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i5-11320H).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-11320H
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-11320H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H). The Core i5-11320H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-11320H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.