Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-11400

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i5-11400

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $22 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 10,350).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 91.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-11400

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 13.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $182 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11400 better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Core i5-11400 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 19.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 26.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 27.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-11400 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11400 is the better fit. You are getting 26.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-11400 is the smarter buy today. Core i5-11400 is 13.8% more expensive on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.5% better value on MSRP (91.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
1080p
low192 FPS189 FPS
medium152 FPS152 FPS
high123 FPS123 FPS
ultra100 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS150 FPS
medium119 FPS119 FPS
high97 FPS97 FPS
ultra79 FPS80 FPS
4K
low82 FPS84 FPS
medium70 FPS72 FPS
high55 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
1080p
low326 FPS416 FPS
medium318 FPS339 FPS
high290 FPS310 FPS
ultra253 FPS270 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS380 FPS
medium292 FPS311 FPS
high267 FPS286 FPS
ultra234 FPS249 FPS
4K
low309 FPS329 FPS
medium258 FPS272 FPS
high235 FPS250 FPS
ultra199 FPS210 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
1080p
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS417 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS417 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS417 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS380 FPS
4K
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS341 FPS
high289 FPS290 FPS
ultra229 FPS229 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
1080p
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS417 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS417 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS417 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS417 FPS
4K
low326 FPS417 FPS
medium326 FPS417 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS387 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core i5-11400

The Core i5-11400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,670 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11400 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-11400 uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-11400's 16,670 — a 24.5% lead for the Core i5-11400. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 10,350 (23.3% advantage for the Core i5-11400). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,960, a 29.6% lead for the Core i5-11400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,260 (22.6% advantage for the Core i5-11400). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+12%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark
13,029
16,670+28%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
10,350+26%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
1,960+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
7,260+26%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-11400) — the Core i5-11400 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B560,Z590 (Core i5-11400).

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-11400 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-11400 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-11400 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-11400 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
Mainstream Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-11400 debuted at $182. On MSRP ($160 vs $182), the Core i5-10400F is $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 91.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-11400 — making the Core i5-11400 the 11.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-11400
MSRP
$160-12%
$182
Performance per Dollar
81.4
91.6+13%
Release Date
2020
2021