
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-11400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,600).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 107.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
Core i5-11400F
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 107.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-11400F
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 107.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,600).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 107.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11400F better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 138 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F
The Core i5-11400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,902 points. Launch price was $157.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-11400F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11400F — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-11400F uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-11400F's 16,902 — a 25.9% lead for the Core i5-11400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,000, a 31.6% lead for the Core i5-11400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,600 (27.2% advantage for the Core i5-11400F). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 16,902+30% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,000+38% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 7,600+31% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-11400F) — the Core i5-11400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B560,Z590 (Core i5-11400F).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-11400F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-11400F targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-11400F debuted at $157. On MSRP ($160 vs $157), the Core i5-11400F is $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 107.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-11400F — making the Core i5-11400F the 27.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $157-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 107.7+32% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












