
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-12490F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12490F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 12,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-12490F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌56.3% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-12490F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12490F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 12,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌56.3% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12490F better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 247 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-12490F

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-12490F
Core i5-12490F
The Core i5-12490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,366 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-12490F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12490F — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12490F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12490F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-12490F's 20,366 — a 43.9% lead for the Core i5-12490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 12,500 (41.7% advantage for the Core i5-12490F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,800, a 21.3% lead for the Core i5-12490F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 8,800 (41.4% advantage for the Core i5-12490F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12490F.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 20,366+56% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 12,500+53% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 1,800+24% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 8,800+52% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12490F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-12490F — the Core i5-12490F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-12490F) — the Core i5-12490F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B660,H610,H670,Z690,B760 (Core i5-12490F).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12490F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-12490F targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-12490F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-12490F debuted at $250. On MSRP ($160 vs $250), the Core i5-10400F is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 81.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-12490F — making the Core i5-12490F the 0% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-36% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 81.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












