PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 16,094).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
38.1% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 16,094).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌
38.1% HIGHER MSRP
$221 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i5-13400T is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 96.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 55.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400T is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the better fit. You are getting 96.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400T is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400T is 38.1% more expensive on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.6% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	192 FPS	170 FPS
medium	152 FPS	157 FPS
high	123 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	142 FPS
medium	119 FPS	123 FPS
high	97 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	80 FPS
medium	70 FPS	74 FPS
high	55 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13400T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	318 FPS	246 FPS
high	290 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	191 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	247 FPS
medium	292 FPS	218 FPS
high	267 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	165 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	158 FPS
medium	258 FPS	141 FPS
high	235 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	117 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13400T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	507 FPS
medium	326 FPS	449 FPS
high	326 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	374 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	489 FPS
medium	326 FPS	420 FPS
high	326 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	386 FPS
medium	326 FPS	326 FPS
high	289 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	242 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13400T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	507 FPS
medium	326 FPS	507 FPS
high	326 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	507 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	507 FPS
medium	326 FPS	507 FPS
high	326 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	472 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	491 FPS
medium	326 FPS	449 FPS
high	326 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	345 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-13400T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-13400T

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13400T offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-13400T's 20,265 — a 43.5% lead for the Core i5-13400T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 16,094 (65.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,364, a 47.7% lead for the Core i5-13400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 11,135 (63.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 16+67%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+123%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	20,265+56%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	16,094+96%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,364+63%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	11,135+93%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400T — the Core i5-13400T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-13400T) — the Core i5-13400T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13400T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 730
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Energy Efficient Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400T debuted at $221. On MSRP ($160 vs $221), the Core i5-10400F is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 91.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400T — making the Core i5-13400T the 11.9% better value option.