PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-13500H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-13500H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13500H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 15,116).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i5-13500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i5-13500H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13500H better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i5-13500H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 84.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 61.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13500H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500H is the stronger fit. You are getting 84.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13500H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-13500H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13500H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-13500H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-13500H

The Core i5-13500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,080 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13500H offers 12 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13500H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500H — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13500H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-13500H's 21,080 — a 47.2% lead for the Core i5-13500H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 15,116 (59.4% advantage for the Core i5-13500H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,400, a 49.1% lead for the Core i5-13500H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 11,500 (66.2% advantage for the Core i5-13500H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	18 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	21,080+62%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	15,116+85%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,400+65%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	11,500+99%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13500H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13500H — the Core i5-13500H supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Core i5-13500H) — the Core i5-13500H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500H
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200+95%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+33%	96 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500H). The Core i5-13500H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13500H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-13500H rivals Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-13500H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	High performance laptop