PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-14400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-14400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14400F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 25,670).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-14400F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Delivers 60.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
22.5% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14400F better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i5-14400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 97% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 97% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-14400F comes in 22.5% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 60.8% better value on MSRP (131.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-14400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-14400F

The Core i5-14400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,670 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400F — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-14400F uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-14400F's 25,670 — a 65.3% lead for the Core i5-14400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400F.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-14400F
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 16+67%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	13,029	25,670+97%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14400F — the Core i5-14400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-14400F) — the Core i5-14400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-14400F
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14400F targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-14400F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core i5-14400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($160 vs $196), Core i5-10400F was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 131.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-14400F — making the Core i5-14400F the 46.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-14400F
MSRP	$160-18%	$196
Performance per Dollar	81.4	131.0+61%
Release Date	2020	2024

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Core i5-14400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.