
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14500 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 130.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-14500
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 60.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 130.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($239 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌49.4% HIGHER MSRP$239 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-14500
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 60.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 130.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($239 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14500 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 130.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-14500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌49.4% HIGHER MSRP$239 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14500 better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 769 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 685 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 739 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-14500

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-14500
Core i5-14500
The Core i5-14500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,205 points. Launch price was $232.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14500 offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-14500 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i5-14500 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-14500 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-14500 uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-14500's 31,205 — a 82.2% lead for the Core i5-14500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,700, a 60% lead for the Core i5-14500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 15,000 (88.7% advantage for the Core i5-14500). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 31,205+140% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,700+86% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 15,000+159% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14500 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14500 — the Core i5-14500 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14500 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-14500) — the Core i5-14500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B760,Z790 (Core i5-14500).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-14500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14500 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-14500 debuted at $239. On MSRP ($160 vs $239), the Core i5-10400F is $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 130.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-14500 — making the Core i5-14500 the 46.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-33% | $239 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 130.6+60% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












