
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14600T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14600T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14600T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 27,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 106.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 31.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌59.4% HIGHER MSRP$255 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14600T.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 31.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14600T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 27,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 106.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌59.4% HIGHER MSRP$255 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14600T better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 132 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 636 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 374 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-14600T

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-14600T
Core i5-14600T
The Core i5-14600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,238 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14600T offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-14600T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-14600T — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i5-14600T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-14600T uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-14600T's 27,238 — a 70.6% lead for the Core i5-14600T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,626, a 57.5% lead for the Core i5-14600T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600T.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+61% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 27,238+109% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,626+81% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-14600T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-14600T — the Core i5-14600T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14600T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i5-14600T) — the Core i5-14600T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-14600T).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14600T). The Core i5-14600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-14600T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-14600T debuted at $255. On MSRP ($160 vs $255), the Core i5-10400F is $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 106.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-14600T — making the Core i5-14600T the 27% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-37% | $255 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 106.8+31% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












