PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $205 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 12,250).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-10700

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $205 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 12,250).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-10700 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 34.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 49.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 23.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700 is the better fit. You are getting 49.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-10700 is 128.1% more expensive on MSRP at $365 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 85.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 44.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-10700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	192 FPS	292 FPS
medium	152 FPS	259 FPS
high	123 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	239 FPS
medium	119 FPS	191 FPS
high	97 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	166 FPS
medium	70 FPS	135 FPS
high	55 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	318 FPS	402 FPS
high	290 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	363 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	292 FPS	402 FPS
high	267 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	310 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	349 FPS
medium	258 FPS	295 FPS
high	235 FPS	273 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	235 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	402 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	289 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
1080p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	402 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	402 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	402 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-10700

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-10700

The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-10700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-10700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-10700's 16,067 — a 20.9% lead for the Core i7-10700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 12,250 (39.7% advantage for the Core i7-10700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,597, a 9.4% lead for the Core i7-10700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,926 (31.3% advantage for the Core i7-10700). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	13,029	16,067+23%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	12,250+50%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,597+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	7,926+37%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B460,H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i7-10700).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10700
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-10700 debuted at $365. On MSRP ($160 vs $365), the Core i5-10400F is $205 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 44.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700 — making the Core i5-10400F the 59.6% better value option.