Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10750H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+12.9% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-10750H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10750H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-10750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-10750H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,545 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-10750H

2020

Why buy it

✅+12.9% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-10750H.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10750H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-10750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,545 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-10750H?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-10750H is ahead with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F pulls ahead with 12.9% better PassMark. Core i5-10400F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 12.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 12.9% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i7-10750H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-10750H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
1080p
low	192 FPS	286 FPS
medium	152 FPS	255 FPS
high	123 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	185 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	235 FPS
medium	119 FPS	189 FPS
high	97 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	164 FPS
medium	70 FPS	133 FPS
high	55 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10750H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	318 FPS	289 FPS
high	290 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	292 FPS	289 FPS
high	267 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	285 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	289 FPS
medium	258 FPS	289 FPS
high	235 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	230 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10750H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	289 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10750H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-10750H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-10750H

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-10750H

The Core i7-10750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,545 points. Launch price was $435.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i7-10750H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-10750H — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-10750H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10750H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-10750H's 11,545 — a 12.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10750H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	13,029+13%	11,545
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-10750H
Socket	LGA1200	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core i7-10750H). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.