PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+47.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $266 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 200.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-11370H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11370H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,563 vs 8,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅+47.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $266 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 200.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-11370H.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11370H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,563 vs 8,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11370H better than Core i5-10400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-11370H is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F pulls ahead with 47.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 47.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11370H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-11370H is 166.3% more expensive on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-10400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 47.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-10400F is also 200.4% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 27.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11370H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-11370H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	192 FPS	268 FPS
medium	152 FPS	238 FPS
high	123 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	238 FPS
medium	119 FPS	193 FPS
high	97 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	166 FPS
medium	70 FPS	136 FPS
high	55 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-11370H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	318 FPS	289 FPS
high	290 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	217 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	292 FPS	251 FPS
high	267 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	229 FPS
medium	258 FPS	193 FPS
high	235 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	131 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-11370H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	289 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-11370H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	289 FPS
medium	326 FPS	289 FPS
high	326 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-11370H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-11370H

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-11370H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-11370H uses Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-11370H's 11,548 — a 12.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 5,563 (38.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,960, a 29.6% lead for the Core i7-11370H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,612 (3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
PassMark	13,029+13%	11,548
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191+47%	5,563
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,960+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+3%	5,612

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-11370H uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-11370H) — the Core i7-11370H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SoC (Core i7-11370H).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11370H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-11370H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Productivity

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-11370H debuted at $426. On MSRP ($160 vs $426), the Core i5-10400F is $266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-11370H — making the Core i5-10400F the 100.1% better value option.