
Core i5-10400F

Core i7-1160G7
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-1160G7 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-1160G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-1160G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $266 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- β Delivers 297.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1160G7.
Trade-offs
- β333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,720 vs 13,029).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-1160G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-1160G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020β2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-1160G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 β a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020β2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-1160G7's 8,720 β a 39.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,454 vs 1,758, a 18.9% lead for the Core i7-1160G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+142% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020β2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029+49% | 8,720 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 1,758+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 β the Core i7-1160G7 supports 60.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Core i7-1160G7) β the Core i5-10400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1598 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR4x-4267+60% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core i7-1160G7 came in at $426. On launch pricing ($160 vs $426), Core i5-10400F was $266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-1160G7 β making the Core i5-10400F the 119.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-62% | $426 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+297% | 20.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














