
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-11700KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 63.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-11700KF.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11700KF across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 15,011).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i7-11700KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.8% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($374 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i7-11700KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 63.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-11700KF.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.8% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11700KF across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 15,011).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($374 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11700KF better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 274 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 354 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-11700KF

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-11700KF
Core i7-11700KF
The Core i7-11700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,811 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-11700KF offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-11700KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-11700KF — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700KF (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-11700KF uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-11700KF's 23,811 — a 58.5% lead for the Core i7-11700KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 15,011 (58.8% advantage for the Core i7-11700KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,287, a 44.5% lead for the Core i7-11700KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 10,874 (61.1% advantage for the Core i7-11700KF). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700KF.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 23,811+83% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 15,011+83% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,287+57% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 10,874+88% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-11700KF) — the Core i7-11700KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Z590,B560 (Core i7-11700KF).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-11700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-11700KF supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-11700KF debuted at $374. On MSRP ($160 vs $374), the Core i5-10400F is $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 63.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-11700KF — making the Core i5-10400F the 24.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-11700KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-57% | $374 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+28% | 63.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












