
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700KF.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 34,056).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 88.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-12700KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌140% HIGHER MSRP$384 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i7-12700KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700KF.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 34,056).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 88.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌140% HIGHER MSRP$384 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700KF better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 821 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 769 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-12700KF

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-12700KF
Core i7-12700KF
The Core i7-12700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,056 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12700KF offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700KF has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700KF — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700KF (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700KF uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-12700KF's 34,056 — a 89.3% lead for the Core i7-12700KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700KF.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 20+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 34,056+161% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700KF uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700KF — the Core i7-12700KF supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-12700KF) — the Core i7-12700KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700KF).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-12700KF rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700KF debuted at $384. On MSRP ($160 vs $384), the Core i5-10400F is $224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 88.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700KF — making the Core i7-12700KF the 8.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-12700KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-58% | $384 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 88.7+9% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












