PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $325 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700HX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 32,157).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.3 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $325 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700HX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 32,157).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.3 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700HX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 43.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 146.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 43.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700HX is the better fit. You are getting 146.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700HX is 203.1% more expensive on MSRP at $485 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 43.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 22.8% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 66.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
1080p
low	192 FPS	264 FPS
medium	152 FPS	254 FPS
high	123 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	225 FPS
medium	119 FPS	193 FPS
high	97 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	154 FPS
medium	70 FPS	131 FPS
high	55 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	340 FPS
medium	318 FPS	291 FPS
high	290 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	295 FPS
medium	292 FPS	264 FPS
high	267 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	176 FPS
medium	258 FPS	159 FPS
high	235 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	132 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	647 FPS
medium	326 FPS	527 FPS
high	326 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	590 FPS
medium	326 FPS	486 FPS
high	326 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	370 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	433 FPS
medium	326 FPS	372 FPS
high	289 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	285 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	804 FPS
medium	326 FPS	804 FPS
high	326 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	635 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	778 FPS
medium	326 FPS	691 FPS
high	326 FPS	599 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	547 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	386 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-13700HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-13700HX

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700HX offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-13700HX's 32,157 — a 84.7% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 24+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
PassMark	13,029	32,157+147%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX — the Core i7-13700HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i7-13700HX) — the Core i7-13700HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Mobile (Core i7-13700HX).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-13700HX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700HX debuted at $485. On MSRP ($160 vs $485), the Core i5-10400F is $325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 66.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700HX — making the Core i5-10400F the 20.5% better value option.