
Core i5-10400F

Core i7-3687U
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-3687U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-3687U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-3687U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +196.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-3687U.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-3687U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-3687U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-3687U
2013Why buy it
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (1,240 vs 5,783).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- β687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-3687U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-3687U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-3687U
The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-3687U offers 2 cores / 4 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U β a 26.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3687U uses Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 β a 133% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,454 vs 640, a 77.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 1,240 (129.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-3687U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+38% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 13,029+397% | 2,621 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+127% | 640 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+366% | 1,240 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-3687U β the Core i5-10400F supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3687U).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-3687U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+67% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-3687U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-3687U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Enthusiast |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













