PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 8,191).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
✅Delivers 156.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 8,191).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-7700?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 38.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 470.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 50.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 38.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 470.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is $112 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 156.3% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 31.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
1080p
low	192 FPS	216 FPS
medium	152 FPS	171 FPS
high	123 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	176 FPS
medium	119 FPS	136 FPS
high	97 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	74 FPS
medium	70 FPS	61 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
1080p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	318 FPS	216 FPS
high	290 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	292 FPS	216 FPS
high	267 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	216 FPS
medium	258 FPS	185 FPS
high	235 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	129 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
1080p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	289 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
1080p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	216 FPS
medium	326 FPS	216 FPS
high	326 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-7700

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-7700 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7700 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-7700's 8,642 — a 40.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 1,435 (140.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+2%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	13,029+51%	8,642
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191+471%	1,435
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700). The Core i7-7700 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7700
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-7700 debuted at $272. On MSRP ($160 vs $272), the Core i5-10400F is $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 31.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7700 — making the Core i5-10400F the 87.7% better value option.