PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,470 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,470 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-7820EQ?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 46.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 74.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 74.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is $218 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 312.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 19.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-7820EQ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
1080p
low	192 FPS	166 FPS
medium	152 FPS	130 FPS
high	123 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	139 FPS
medium	119 FPS	108 FPS
high	97 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	66 FPS
medium	70 FPS	55 FPS
high	55 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7820EQ

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
1080p
low	326 FPS	176 FPS
medium	318 FPS	151 FPS
high	290 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	153 FPS
medium	292 FPS	131 FPS
high	267 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	120 FPS
medium	258 FPS	106 FPS
high	235 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	61 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7820EQ

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
1080p
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	326 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	326 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	187 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	289 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	180 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7820EQ

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
1080p
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	326 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	326 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	187 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	187 FPS
medium	326 FPS	187 FPS
high	326 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	187 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-7820EQ

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-7820EQ

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-7820EQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 32.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7820EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 54.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+39%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	13,029+74%	7,470
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core i7-7820EQ). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-7820EQ
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-7820EQ debuted at $378. On MSRP ($160 vs $378), the Core i5-10400F is $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7820EQ — making the Core i5-10400F the 121.9% better value option.